On 11/8/21 01:22, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
On 11/5/21 10:51, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance of
0. This causes Linux to complain "
Excerpts from Aneesh Kumar K.V's message of November 8, 2021 2:22 pm:
> Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
>
>> On 11/5/21 10:51, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
>>> results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance o
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:52:13PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 11/5/21 10:51, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
> > results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance of
> > 0. This causes Linux to
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
> On 11/5/21 10:51, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
>> results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance of
>> 0. This causes Linux to complain "Invalid distance value range" because
On 11/5/21 10:51, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance of
0. This causes Linux to complain "Invalid distance value range" because
a node distance is smaller than the loca
A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance of
0. This causes Linux to complain "Invalid distance value range" because
a node distance is smaller than the local distance.
Fix this by building a simple loc