On 30/03/20 19:56, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>> Why do you make it a sub-state?
>> Because it's consistent with serial-isa and it's simple.
> ok, lgtm then
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Hi
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:41 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert
wrote:
>
> * Marc-André Lureau (marcandre.lur...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:47 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> > >
> > > After c9808d60281 we have bo
* Marc-André Lureau (marcandre.lur...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:47 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > After c9808d60281 we have both an object representing the serial-isa
> > device and a separate object representing
Hi
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:47 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
wrote:
>
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> After c9808d60281 we have both an object representing the serial-isa
> device and a separate object representing the underlying common serial
> uart. Both of these have vmsd's associate
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
After c9808d60281 we have both an object representing the serial-isa
device and a separate object representing the underlying common serial
uart. Both of these have vmsd's associated with them and thus the
migration stream ends up with two copies of the migration d
