On 29/01/20 15:49, Luc Michel wrote:
> The seqlock write unlock function was incorrectly calling
> seqlock_write_begin() instead of seqlock_write_end(), and was releasing
> the lock before incrementing the sequence. This could lead to a race
> condition and a corrupted sequence number becoming odd
On 1/29/20 3:49 PM, Luc Michel wrote:
The seqlock write unlock function was incorrectly calling
seqlock_write_begin() instead of seqlock_write_end(), and was releasing
the lock before incrementing the sequence. This could lead to a race
condition and a corrupted sequence number becoming odd even
The seqlock write unlock function was incorrectly calling
seqlock_write_begin() instead of seqlock_write_end(), and was releasing
the lock before incrementing the sequence. This could lead to a race
condition and a corrupted sequence number becoming odd even though the
lock is not held.
Signed-off