On Mon Mar 17, 2025 at 11:13 PM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 3/14/25 21:01, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> Coverity reported that return value of blk_pwrite() maybe should not
>>> be ignored. We can't do much if this happens other than report an
>>> er
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/14/25 21:01, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Coverity reported that return value of blk_pwrite() maybe should not
be ignored. We can't do much if this happens other than report an
error but let's do that to silence this report.
Resolves: Coverity CID 1593
On 3/14/25 21:01, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Coverity reported that return value of blk_pwrite() maybe should not
be ignored. We can't do much if this happens other than report an
error but let's do that to silence this report.
Resolves: Coverity CID 1593725
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/pp
On Sat Mar 15, 2025 at 6:01 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Coverity reported that return value of blk_pwrite() maybe should not
> be ignored. We can't do much if this happens other than report an
> error but let's do that to silence this report.
>
> Resolves: Coverity CID 1593725
> Signed-off-by:
Coverity reported that return value of blk_pwrite() maybe should not
be ignored. We can't do much if this happens other than report an
error but let's do that to silence this report.
Resolves: Coverity CID 1593725
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ppc/amigaone.c | 14 --
1 file ch
