On 6/11/20 12:27 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/10/20 11:13 PM, Sven Schnelle wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi Sven, could you review thiw one-line patch?
>>>
>>> On 4/18/20 2:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
The tulip driver claims
On 6/10/20 11:13 PM, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Sven, could you review thiw one-line patch?
>>
>> On 4/18/20 2:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> The tulip driver claims to emulate dec21143 and it does not emulate
>>> dec21142
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Sven, could you review thiw one-line patch?
>
> On 4/18/20 2:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > The tulip driver claims to emulate dec21143 and it does not emulate
> > dec21142.
> > The dec21142 and dec21143 can be discerned
Hi Sven, could you review thiw one-line patch?
On 4/18/20 2:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The tulip driver claims to emulate dec21143 and it does not emulate dec21142.
> The dec21142 and dec21143 can be discerned by the PCI revision register,
> where dec21142 reports value < 0x20 and dec21143 value
On 4/18/20 2:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The tulip driver claims to emulate dec21143 and it does not emulate dec21142.
> The dec21142 and dec21143 can be discerned by the PCI revision register,
> where dec21142 reports value < 0x20 and dec21143 value >= 0x20. E.g. the
> U-Boot 'tulip' driver also o
The tulip driver claims to emulate dec21143 and it does not emulate dec21142.
The dec21142 and dec21143 can be discerned by the PCI revision register,
where dec21142 reports value < 0x20 and dec21143 value >= 0x20. E.g. the
U-Boot 'tulip' driver also only supports dec21143 and verifies that the
PCI
