On 5/24/23 14:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 13:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Queued, thanks.
Can you unqueue it, please? This is reverting a fix we
deliberately put in in commit 464e3671f9d5c.
Yes, I have done so.
Paolo
On 5/24/23 12:30, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 23:39, Richard Henderson
wrote:
Remove the signed * signed check, leaving the signed * unsigned check.
This link test runs foul of -fsanitize=undefined, where clang-11 has
an undefined reference to __muloti4 to check for signed over
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 13:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Queued, thanks.
Can you unqueue it, please? This is reverting a fix we
deliberately put in in commit 464e3671f9d5c.
thanks
-- PMM
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 23:39, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Remove the signed * signed check, leaving the signed * unsigned check.
> This link test runs foul of -fsanitize=undefined, where clang-11 has
> an undefined reference to __muloti4 to check for signed overflow.
If you can't do a signed * s
Remove the signed * signed check, leaving the signed * unsigned check.
This link test runs foul of -fsanitize=undefined, where clang-11 has
an undefined reference to __muloti4 to check for signed overflow.
This failure prevents us properly detecting atomic128 support.
Signed-off-by: Richard Hende
