Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-27 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:20 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned,

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-27 Thread Bin Meng
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned,

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-27 Thread Atish Patra
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:21 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned,

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-26 Thread Alistair Francis
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:45 PM Atish Kumar Patra wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:15 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > > +Atish > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Alistair

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-22 Thread Atish Kumar Patra
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:15 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > > > +Atish > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Alistair Francis > > > > > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment fr

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-22 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > +Atish > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis > wrote: > > > > From: Alistair Francis > > > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory t

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-07 Thread Bin Meng
+Atish On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB a

[PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-07 Thread Alistair Francis
From: Alistair Francis We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned, so let's drop it down to 2MB so that we can support systems with le