On Aug 26 16:15, Jinhao Fan wrote:
> Sure. I’ve already reworked this iothread patch upon the new irqfd
> patch. I think I can post a v2 patch today. Do you mean I include
> irqfd v3 in the new iothread patch series?
>
Yes, please include irqfd-v3 in the series.
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
Sure. I’ve already reworked this iothread patch upon the new irqfd patch. I
think I can post a v2 patch today. Do you mean I include irqfd v3 in the new
iothread patch series?
发自我的iPhone
> 在 2022年8月26日,15:12,Klaus Jensen 写道:
>
> On Jul 20 17:00, Jinhao Fan wrote:
>> Add an option "iothread=x
On Jul 20 17:00, Jinhao Fan wrote:
> Add an option "iothread=x" to do emulation in a seperate iothread.
> This improves the performance because QEMU's main loop is responsible
> for a lot of other work while iothread is dedicated to NVMe emulation.
> Moreover, emulating in iothread brings the poten
On Jul 26 16:55, Jinhao Fan wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus and Keith,
>
> I just added support for interrupt masking. How can I test interrupt
> masking?
>
I wondered if this might be possible to test this with a user-space
VFIO-based driver, but VFIO does not export masking/unmasking on
MSI/MSI-X through
at 10:56 AM, Jinhao Fan wrote:
> at 2:07 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>
>> MSI-x uses MMIO for masking, so there's no need for an NVMe specific way to
>> mask these interrupts. You can just use the generic PCIe methods to clear the
>> vector's enable bit. But no NVMe driver that I know of is making u
at 2:07 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> MSI-x uses MMIO for masking, so there's no need for an NVMe specific way to
> mask these interrupts. You can just use the generic PCIe methods to clear the
> vector's enable bit. But no NVMe driver that I know of is making use of these
> either, though it should b
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:32:57PM +0800, Jinhao Fan wrote:
> at 10:45 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0800, Jinhao Fan wrote:
> >> Hi Klaus and Keith,
> >>
> >> I just added support for interrupt masking. How can I test interrupt
> >> masking?
> >
> > Are you a
at 10:45 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0800, Jinhao Fan wrote:
>> Hi Klaus and Keith,
>>
>> I just added support for interrupt masking. How can I test interrupt
>> masking?
>
> Are you asking about MSI masking? I don't think any drivers are using the
> feature, so
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0800, Jinhao Fan wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus and Keith,
>
> I just added support for interrupt masking. How can I test interrupt
> masking?
Are you asking about MSI masking? I don't think any drivers are using the
feature, so you'd need to modify one to test it. I can
at 5:00 PM, Jinhao Fan wrote:
> Add an option "iothread=x" to do emulation in a seperate iothread.
> This improves the performance because QEMU's main loop is responsible
> for a lot of other work while iothread is dedicated to NVMe emulation.
> Moreover, emulating in iothread brings the potentia
Add an option "iothread=x" to do emulation in a seperate iothread.
This improves the performance because QEMU's main loop is responsible
for a lot of other work while iothread is dedicated to NVMe emulation.
Moreover, emulating in iothread brings the potential of polling on
SQ/CQ doorbells, which I
11 matches
Mail list logo