On 4/5/23 12:57, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
As Coverity points out (CID 1508621) the calculation to increment i in
the fill fallback loop is ineffective as it is overwritten in next
statement. This was left there by mistake from a previous version but
is not needed in the current approach so remove
On 5/4/23 17:57, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
As Coverity points out (CID 1508621) the calculation to increment i in
the fill fallback loop is ineffective as it is overwritten in next
statement. This was left there by mistake from a previous version but
is not needed in the current approach so remove th
As Coverity points out (CID 1508621) the calculation to increment i in
the fill fallback loop is ineffective as it is overwritten in next
statement. This was left there by mistake from a previous version but
is not needed in the current approach so remove the superfluous
increment statement.
Repor
