Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT

2023-05-15 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 15.05.2023 o 12:27, Leif Lindholm pisze: On 2023-05-15 11:15, Peter Maydell wrote: Why do we need to provide a full GIC DTB node ? Longer-term, I want to be able to present different specific gic implementations through this interface. I believe the 0.1 variant needs only the Distrib

Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT

2023-05-15 Thread Leif Lindholm
On 2023-05-15 11:15, Peter Maydell wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 11:04, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Let add GIC information into DeviceTree as part of SBSA-REF versioning. Trusted Firmware will read it and provide to next firmware level. Bumps platform version to 0.1 one so we can check is nod

Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT

2023-05-15 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 15.05.2023 o 12:15, Peter Maydell pisze:> On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 11:04, Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: >> >> Let add GIC information into DeviceTree as part of SBSA-REF versioning. >> >> Trusted Firmware will read it and provide to next firmware level. >> >> Bumps platform version to 0.1 one

Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT

2023-05-15 Thread Peter Maydell
On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 11:04, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > Let add GIC information into DeviceTree as part of SBSA-REF versioning. > > Trusted Firmware will read it and provide to next firmware level. > > Bumps platform version to 0.1 one so we can check is node is present. (Missing signed-off-b

[PATCH] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT

2023-05-15 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Let add GIC information into DeviceTree as part of SBSA-REF versioning. Trusted Firmware will read it and provide to next firmware level. Bumps platform version to 0.1 one so we can check is node is present. --- hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c | 38 +- 1 file changed, 37 in