On 22/06/2022 18.38, Darren Kenny wrote:
On Wednesday, 2022-06-22 at 12:28:40 -04, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
On 220622 1703, Darren Kenny wrote:
Hi Alex,
This looks good to me, so:
Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny
But, if it is at all possible to use Bash glob in a '[[ ... ]]' test
such as:
if
On Wednesday, 2022-06-22 at 12:28:40 -04, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> On 220622 1703, Darren Kenny wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> This looks good to me, so:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny
>>
>> But, if it is at all possible to use Bash glob in a '[[ ... ]]' test
>> such as:
>>
>> if [[ $target ==
On 220622 1703, Darren Kenny wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> This looks good to me, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny
>
> But, if it is at all possible to use Bash glob in a '[[ ... ]]' test
> such as:
>
> if [[ $target == generic-fuzz-* ]]; then
>
> that might read better - but it seems the default
Hi Alex,
This looks good to me, so:
Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny
But, if it is at all possible to use Bash glob in a '[[ ... ]]' test
such as:
if [[ $target == generic-fuzz-* ]]; then
that might read better - but it seems the default is that we don't
assume that, or am I wrong? (This is probab
The non-generic-fuzz targets often time-out, or run out of memory.
Additionally, they create unreproducible bug-reports. It is possible
that this is resulting in failing coverage-reports on OSS-Fuzz. In the
future, these test-cases should be fixed, or removed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
