Am 29.04.2025 um 23:09 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Block devices that don't support discard have a discard_granularity of
> > 0. Currently, this results in a division by zero when we try to make
> > sure that it's a multiple of reque
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Block devices that don't support discard have a discard_granularity of
> 0. Currently, this results in a division by zero when we try to make
> sure that it's a multiple of request_alignment. Only try to update
> bs->bl.pdiscard_alignmen
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Block devices that don't support discard have a discard_granularity of
> 0. Currently, this results in a division by zero when we try to make
> sure that it's a multiple of request_alignment. Only try to update
> bs->bl.pdiscard_alignmen
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Block devices that don't support discard have a discard_granularity of
> 0. Currently, this results in a division by zero when we try to make
> sure that it's a multiple of request_alignment. Only try to update
> bs->bl.pdiscard_alignmen
Block devices that don't support discard have a discard_granularity of
0. Currently, this results in a division by zero when we try to make
sure that it's a multiple of request_alignment. Only try to update
bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment when we got a non-zero discard_granularity
from sysfs.
Fixes: f60
