On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 4:53 PM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>
> On 2023/06/02 16:25, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > The datasheet does not say what happens when interrupt was asserted
> > (ICR.INT_ASSERT=1) and auto mask is *not* active.
> > However, section of 13.3.27 the PCIe* GbE Controllers Open Source
> >
On 2023/06/02 16:25, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The datasheet does not say what happens when interrupt was asserted
(ICR.INT_ASSERT=1) and auto mask is *not* active.
However, section of 13.3.27 the PCIe* GbE Controllers Open Source
Software Developer’s Manual, which were written for older devices,
name
[Removed bpoir...@suse.com from Cc: again.]
Am 02.06.23 um 11:41 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear Akihiko,
Thank you for your patch.
After looking at the diff, it looks like this is a QEMU patch, and not
one for the Linux kernel. I leave my inline comments anyway.
Am 02.06.23 um 09:25 schrieb Ak
Dear Akihiko,
Thank you for your patch.
After looking at the diff, it looks like this is a QEMU patch, and not
one for the Linux kernel. I leave my inline comments anyway.
Am 02.06.23 um 09:25 schrieb Akihiko Odaki:
It’d be nice if you started by summarizing the bug.
The datasheet does n
The datasheet does not say what happens when interrupt was asserted
(ICR.INT_ASSERT=1) and auto mask is *not* active.
However, section of 13.3.27 the PCIe* GbE Controllers Open Source
Software Developer’s Manual, which were written for older devices,
namely 631xESB/632xESB, 82563EB/82564EB, 82571EB
