Re: [PATCH] aspeed: Support AST2600A1 silicon revision

2020-05-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 10:37, Joel Stanley wrote: > > There are minimal differences from Qemu's point of view between the A0 > and A1 silicon revisions. > > As the A1 exercises different code paths in u-boot it is desirable to > emulate that instead. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley Applied to t

Re: [PATCH] aspeed: Support AST2600A1 silicon revision

2020-05-04 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 5/4/20 11:37 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > There are minimal differences from Qemu's point of view between the A0 > and A1 silicon revisions. > > As the A1 exercises different code paths in u-boot it is desirable to > emulate that instead. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley Reviewed-by: Cédric Le G

Re: [PATCH] aspeed: Support AST2600A1 silicon revision

2020-05-04 Thread Andrew Jeffery
On Mon, 4 May 2020, at 19:07, Joel Stanley wrote: > There are minimal differences from Qemu's point of view between the A0 > and A1 silicon revisions. > > As the A1 exercises different code paths in u-boot it is desirable to > emulate that instead. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley > --- > hw/

[PATCH] aspeed: Support AST2600A1 silicon revision

2020-05-04 Thread Joel Stanley
There are minimal differences from Qemu's point of view between the A0 and A1 silicon revisions. As the A1 exercises different code paths in u-boot it is desirable to emulate that instead. Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley --- hw/arm/aspeed.c | 8 hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c |