On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:48:57PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:35 PM Eric DeVolder
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/13/22 09:10, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > > At any step when any validation fail in check_erst_backend_storage(),
> > > there is
> > > no need to continue further thro
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:35 PM Eric DeVolder wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/13/22 09:10, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > At any step when any validation fail in check_erst_backend_storage(), there
> > is
> > no need to continue further through other validation checks. Further, by
> > continuing even when record_size
On 5/13/22 09:10, Ani Sinha wrote:
At any step when any validation fail in check_erst_backend_storage(), there is
no need to continue further through other validation checks. Further, by
continuing even when record_size is 0, we run the risk of triggering a divide
by zero error if we continued
On Fri, 13 May 2022 19:40:05 +0530
Ani Sinha wrote:
> At any step when any validation fail in check_erst_backend_storage(), there is
> no need to continue further through other validation checks. Further, by
> continuing even when record_size is 0, we run the risk of triggering a divide
> by zero
At any step when any validation fail in check_erst_backend_storage(), there is
no need to continue further through other validation checks. Further, by
continuing even when record_size is 0, we run the risk of triggering a divide
by zero error if we continued with other validation checks. Hence, we
