Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a general architecture section for x86

2023-11-12 Thread Thomas Huth
On 07/11/2023 10.50, Thomas Huth wrote: On 16/10/2023 11.05, Thomas Huth wrote: On 29/09/2023 15.45, Thomas Huth wrote: It's a little bit weird that the files in target/i386/ which are not in a subfolder there do not have any associated maintainer (and thus nobody might be CC:-ed on changes to

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a general architecture section for x86

2023-11-07 Thread Thomas Huth
On 16/10/2023 11.05, Thomas Huth wrote: On 29/09/2023 15.45, Thomas Huth wrote: It's a little bit weird that the files in target/i386/ which are not in a subfolder there do not have any associated maintainer (and thus nobody might be CC:-ed on changes to these files). We should have a general x8

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a general architecture section for x86

2023-10-16 Thread Thomas Huth
On 29/09/2023 15.45, Thomas Huth wrote: It's a little bit weird that the files in target/i386/ which are not in a subfolder there do not have any associated maintainer (and thus nobody might be CC:-ed on changes to these files). We should have a general x86 section for these files, similar to wha

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a general architecture section for x86

2023-09-29 Thread Thomas Huth
It's a little bit weird that the files in target/i386/ which are not in a subfolder there do not have any associated maintainer (and thus nobody might be CC:-ed on changes to these files). We should have a general x86 section for these files, similar to what we already have for s390x and mips. Sinc