nyoro.ga...@gmail.com writes:
> From: Samker
>
> This is patch replaces WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call with the
> QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
You could extend this description as to why ".. because it extends the
scope of the lock to the whole function rather than the non-existent
block".
Otherwise:
Revi
Hi Philippe,
> This patch doesn't apply...
> $ git grep QEMU_LOCK_GUARD origin/master -- softmmu/physmem.c
> $
> On what is it based?
I initially replaced lock()/unlock() calls in the softmmu/physmem.c with
the more preferred WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call.
However Stefan pointed out that inste
Hi,
On 8/11/22 06:11, nyoro.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Samker
This is patch replaces WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call with the
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
Signed-off-by: Samker
---
softmmu/physmem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/phy
From: Samker
This is patch replaces WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call with the
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
Signed-off-by: Samker
---
softmmu/physmem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
index fb00596777..907491ae17 100644
--- a/softmmu