A bit of history from Warner:
This has been that way the bsd-user sources were reorganized in
2015. I can find no good reason in the FreeBSD sources to do
this (we've been transitioning from the pre-standardized BSD
convention of u_intXX_t -> uintXX_t for 25 years now it seems). I
don't see any ol
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:45 AM Juan Quintela wrote:
> This is the only use of u_int32_t in the whole tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
>
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh
I'll queue this version if others don't beat me to it. I plan on merging
that around June 1
On 11/5/23 10:45, Juan Quintela wrote:
This is the only use of u_int32_t in the whole tree.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
---
bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
This is the only use of u_int32_t in the whole tree.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
---
bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h b/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h
index 070fa24da
