Re: [PATCH] 9pfs: improve v9fs_walk() tracing

2024-12-06 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 9:59:59 PM CET Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:14:28AM +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > 'Twalk' is the most important request type in the 9p protocol to look out > > for when debugging 9p communication. That's because it is the only part > >

Re: [PATCH] 9pfs: improve v9fs_walk() tracing

2024-12-04 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:14:28AM +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > 'Twalk' is the most important request type in the 9p protocol to look out > for when debugging 9p communication. That's because it is the only part > of the 9p protocol which actually deals with human-readable path names, > wh

Re: [PATCH] 9pfs: improve v9fs_walk() tracing

2024-12-04 Thread Greg Kurz
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:14:28 +0100 Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > 'Twalk' is the most important request type in the 9p protocol to look out > for when debugging 9p communication. That's because it is the only part > of the 9p protocol which actually deals with human-readable path names, > whereas

[PATCH] 9pfs: improve v9fs_walk() tracing

2024-12-03 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
'Twalk' is the most important request type in the 9p protocol to look out for when debugging 9p communication. That's because it is the only part of the 9p protocol which actually deals with human-readable path names, whereas all other 9p request types work on numeric file IDs (FIDs) only. Improve