Yes, it's also work.
So you prefer the latter?
zhong...@sangfor.com.cn
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: 2016-12-16 18:10
To: Junlian Bell
CC: qemu-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi-disk: passthrough VERIFY command
On 16/12/2016 08:55, Junlian Bell wrote:
> When a scsi-disk object
>No, it's not seconds. It depends on the interval of the periodic interrupt.
>
>In any case this approach is not acceptable, unfortunately; it causes
>the time to go backwards for the guest as soon as an interrupt is coalesced.
>
>What is the guest that you're seeing issues with?
Yes, it's leng
MC146818 RTC: coordinate guest clock base to destination host after migration
qemu tracks guest time based on vector [base_rtc, last_update], in which
last_update stands for a monotonic tick which is actually uptime of the host.
according to rtc implementation codes of recent releases and upstream
MC146818 RTC: coordinate guest clock base to destination host after migration
qemu tracks guest time based on vector [base_rtc, last_update], in which
last_update stands for a monotonic tick which is actually uptime of the host.
according to rtc implementation codes of recent releases and upstream
Hi, Paolo
This is another patch arround RTC. Would you please have a review.
--separation-
MC146818 RTC: Get correct guest time when irq coalesced
When irq coalesce occurred, irq_coalesced actually store the seconds
that the time sa
Hi, Paolo
This is a simplified patch according to your advice. Would you please reiview
it again.
separation
line
MC146818 RTC: coordinate guest clock base to destination host after migration
qemu tracks guest ti
Thanks again, sincerely.
zhong...@sangfor.com.cn
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: 2016-09-21 23:15
To: zhong...@sangfor.com.cn; qemu-devel
CC: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH]MC146818 RTC: coordinate guest clock base to destination
host after migration
On 21/09/2016 09:36, zhong...@sang
;
-if (version_id <= 2) {
+if (rtc_clock == QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME || version_id <= 2) {
rtc_set_time(s);
s->offset = 0;
check_update_timer(s);
---
Could you send me the complete patch?
zhong...@sangfor.com.cn
From: zhong...@sangfor.com.cn
Date: 2016-09-21
tc.
Thinks!
the model disrupted.
yes, approach we choose looks a little tediously long. but we'll gain in the
future, when we trying to improve
zhong...@sangfor.com.cn
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: 2016-09-20 21:12
To: zhong...@sangfor.com.cn; qemu-devel
CC: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re:
mem-merge=off \
-post win2008x64_Sangfor123clone
---
> On 20/09/2016 09:19, zhong...@sangfor.com.cn wrote:
> > qemu tracks guest time based on vector [base_rtc, last_update], in which
> > last_update stands for a monotonic tick which is actually uptime of the
> host.
>
> But last_
yes, the full options on clock is '-rtc driftfix=slew,clock=rt,base=localtime'
zhong...@sangfor.com.cn
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: 2016-09-20 16:17
To: zhong...@sangfor.com.cn; qemu-devel
CC: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH]MC146818 RTC: coordinate guest clock base to destina
11 matches
Mail list logo
