At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:44:23 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:40 PM, wrote:
> > At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:50:57 +0200,
> > Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> >> > At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:51:08 +0200,
> >> > Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >> >
At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:50:57 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> > At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:51:08 +0200,
> > Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > At Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:22:38 +0200,
> >> > Artyom Tara
At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:51:08 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:22:38 +0200,
> > Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >
> >> clear interrupt request if the interrupt priority < CPU pil
> >> clear hardware interrupt request if inte
Hi,
At Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:22:38 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> clear interrupt request if the interrupt priority < CPU pil
> clear hardware interrupt request if interrupts are disabled
Not directly related to the fix, but I'd like to note a problem
of hw/sun4u.c interrupt code:
The interrupt
At Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:44:27 +0200,
Stefan Weil wrote:
> This change is needed because commit 06e12b65
> now uses an unsigned long long value
> (uint64_t && unsigned long long => unsigned long long).
>
> Cc: Tsuneo Saito
> Cc: Blue Swirl
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
I'm sorry, my patch has br
At Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:31:52 +0300,
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:13 PM, wrote:
> > The softmmu version of current implementation is incorrect.
> > Nonfaulting loads should generate exceptions in the same way as
> > normal loads. The CPU hardware should not return zero automatic
At Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:46:30 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Tsuneo Saito wrote:
> > Support UA2007 block store ASIs for stfa instructions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tsuneo Saito
> > ---
> > target-sparc/op_helper.c | 6 +-
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions
At Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:38:18 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:13 AM, wrote:
> > At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:34:10 +0300,
> > Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, wrote:
> >> > At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:09:28 +0100,
> >> > Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >> >> >> N
Hi,
At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:34:10 +0300,
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, wrote:
> > At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:09:28 +0100,
> > Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >> >> Nice series!
> >> >> May I ask what have you used as a test case to discover the problem?
> >> >
> >> > I found the prob
Hi,
At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:19:16 +0300,
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Tsuneo Saito wrote:
> >>So you should perform some arithmetic with
> >> the ASI numbe
Hi,
At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:09:28 +0100,
Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >> Nice series!
> >> May I ask what have you used as a test case to discover the problem?
> >
> > I found the problem when I was trying to run the linux/sparc64 kernel.
> > It seemed that copy_to_user() did not work as expected.
>
Hi,
At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:57:19 +0200,
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Tsuneo Saito wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series implements sparcv9 stfa/ldfa instructions with
> > non block-transfer ASIs that implementations seem to be left unfinished.
> > This patch also
12 matches
Mail list logo
