Hello
If we keep -m parameter same, does it matter, if we make a snapshot (in
qcow2 image) with qemu-0.14 and use it with qemu-0.15 or vice versa?
Is there any other change, which affects use of snapshot.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
switch to more recent than
0.15).
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
I also have question whether -icount 0 or -icount auto can make a
simulation more deterministic and whether qemu is affected by the load on
the host (i.e. how many processes are running?) I would be grateful for a
reply.
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:36 AM, sparsh
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sparsh mittal
> wrote:
> > I am using qemu as a part of Marss cycle-accurate simulator.
> > http://marss86.org/~marss86/index.php/Home
> >
> > $ qemu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4G
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 07.12.2011 17:26, schrieb sparsh mittal:
> > I use version 0.15 of qemu with marss cycle-accurate simulator.
> >
> > After making checkpoints in an image, I get this error, while trying to
> > boot it (i.e. not usi
affected by the load on
the host (i.e. how many processes are running?)
Sparsh
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:41 PM, sparsh mittal
> wrote:
> > I get this warning while using a checkpoint. I issued the command -m 4G
> > -
I get this warning while using a checkpoint. I issued the command -m 4G
-icount 0 and other parameters.
Unknown savevm section type 32
qemu-system-x86_64: Error -22 while loading VM state
My computer has 48GB RAM, so I don't know what is the problem?
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
boot - please use a kernel appropriate for your CPU
Interesting thing is that when I issue
-loadvm checkpointname
Then it works fine.
Can someone help in this regard?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
.
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
be grateful for some help.
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Mulyadi Santosa
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 21:49, sparsh mittal
> wrote:
> > GBrange numberOfAddresses
> >
> > 0-0.5---> 3325
> >
> > 0.5-1---> 125
Hello
I am using marss with qemu, but this question is related to qemu & kernel.
When I use:
qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4G myImage.img
and print physical addresses that are passed to cache hierarchy, I see that
the physical addresses are not in uniform range: for example:
GBrange numberOfAddresses
0
pointer.Thanks
in advance.
Thanks and Regards
Sparsh Mittal
12 matches
Mail list logo
