Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1089006] Re: Qemu scrambles order of eth devices in vm

2012-12-18 Thread john fisher
On 12/12/2012 11:59 AM, john fisher wrote: > > Are we on the right track here, is there some way to control the order > as presented by Qemu when the VM's OS

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1089006] Re: Qemu scrambles order of eth devices in vm

2012-12-12 Thread john fisher
Thank you Daniel. I understand what you say and agree. However when presented with a mapping and an order by libvirt, shouldn't the order be preserved by default? If the OS scrambles it, then fine, not your problem... Are we on the right track here, is there some way to control the order as pres

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1089006] [NEW] Qemu scrambles order of eth devices in vm

2012-12-12 Thread john fisher
Public bug reported: HV = 12.04 LTS plus libvirt 1.0x VM = 12.04 LTS On the HV there are 12 eth interfaces which we make available to the VM. We have 4 10G virtual function interfaces, and 8 1G conventionally bridged interfaces. No matter what order we present the interfaces in the xml file, they

[Qemu-devel] Qemu scrambles eth device order in VM

2012-12-12 Thread john fisher
bug report) thanks. -- John Fisher

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 602336] Re: bad network performance with 10Gbit

2012-12-10 Thread john fisher
Depending on your networking hardware, you may need to use a virtual function to access the 10G from a guest. On mine, failing to set up the xml file correctly resulted in a NAT connection or a bridge connection instead of the full-speed connection. This requires libvirt 1.0x BTW. the xml that wo