That's what I thought; just had to be sure.
Thanks all...
On 01/13/2014 09:38 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> immersive.ex...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> So it sounds like you're saying selinux is the only meaningful thing to try?
&g
er
to the host OS;
not so much for security...
On 01/12/2014 11:11 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 02:17:43PM -0500, immersive.ex...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Would there be any security benefits, without suffering any considerable
>> relative los
Would there be any security benefits, without suffering any considerable
relative loss in performance, to (chroot) jailing qemu? Can it,
practically speaking, be done?? Would that be a partial safeguard
against virtual machine escapes? Or is it the case that if a virtual
machine escape takes place,
