I found another typo In comment from last night about compilling u-boot.
This line
$ make all_ca9x4_defconfig ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-eabi-
should look:
$ make all ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-eabi-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, wh
I see.
I can take a look.
Could this procedure be helpfull in this case? Error message was similar but it
was related to loading coreboot
http://blog.3mdeb.com/2014/08/07/debugging-coreboot-for-qemu-armv7-vexpress-a9-emulated-mainboard/
Or there are better tools to do this job?
--
You received
Does -smp cores=4 means qemu is emulaing versatile espress a9 with 4
cores ( this is how versatile express board is designed - i mean it's a
board with 4 cores cotex a9 ) and qemu without -smp parameter emalates
jus single core ( unicore )?
In case of versatile express a9 u-boot binary:
U-boot wa
And if this is not clear - in all cases everything was OK when emulation was
started without -smp cors=2 or 3 or 4. By OK i mean there was no
qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x
errors and I was able to execute some comands like help and printenv and
nothing hap
Yes, there are still problems on qemu 2.6.0 release candidate and 2.5.1
with same version of u-boot as mentioned and with latest stable u-boot
release. When qemu has parameter -smp cores=2 or 3 or 4.
errors are:
qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x31306c70
That adress chang
Sorry, missed '-' character at the end of command obviously. It shaould
be:
$ make vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-eabi-
$ make all_ca9x4_defconfig ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-eabi-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml,
Public bug reported:
Report based on:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37068688/have-you-got-issues-with-running-u-boot-for-versatile-express-a9-platform-under
I don't see any bug reports about vexpress boards emulation here, so I
decided to let you know:
version tested: qemu 2.0.0 on 32 bit
