> Le 14/03/2018 �� 10:09, Xuetao Guan a 茅crit��:
>>
>>> [...]
>>> Personally, I think it's useful to consider not merely "do we
>>> have anybody actively maintaining this" (after all our x86 frontend
>>> is not exactly very well-love
> [...]
> Personally, I think it's useful to consider not merely "do we
> have anybody actively maintaining this" (after all our x86 frontend
> is not exactly very well-loved!) but also "are there users of QEMU
> out there using it?" and "is this actually something that exists
> in the real world
> I propose that we deprecate and plan to remove the unicore32 code:
>
> * It has had no changes since 2012 that were not tree-wide
>maintenance/API changes/other global updates
> * We dropped the linux-user unicore32 support in 2016 because of
>a clash between the 'old ABI' that it was i
> On 03/30/2017 07:50 PM, Suramya Shah wrote:
>> Running QEMU with qemu-system-unicore32 without the kernel parameter
>> results in an assertion error.
>> Assert should not be used to check user provided parameters. Report an
>> error and exit instead
>> Signed-off-by: Suramya Shah
Thanks Suramya
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
>
> Asked-by: Guan Xuetao
Sorry, should be
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao
>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>> {target-unicore32 => target/unicore32}/Makefile.objs | 0
>> {target-unicore32 => target/unicore32}/cpu-qom.h | 0
>>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Asked-by: Guan Xuetao
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> {target-unicore32 => target/unicore32}/Makefile.objs | 0
> {target-unicore32 => target/unicore32}/cpu-qom.h | 0
> {target-unicore32 => target/unicore32}/cpu.c
>> > The problem we see is that the system call numbers in qemus
>> > unicore32/syscall_nr.h dont match what is linux mainline kernel. From
>> the
>> > toolchain linked, you seem to have kernel headers and syscall numbers
>> > based on a custom 2.6.32 fork. If one builds unicore32 binaries based
>>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:09:55PM +0800, MPRC wrote:
>> Hi, I'm fixing the syscall problem for linux-user/unicore32 in qemu.
>>
>> I write a "hello world" program to test linux-user/unicore32 in qemu 2.7
>> with toolchain of uc4-1.0.5(you can download it through
>> http://mprc.pku.edu.cn/~guanxu
> On 14 June 2016 at 14:43, Xuetao Guan wrote:
>>> On 20 May 2016 at 13:48, Riku Voipio wrote:
>>>> On torstaina 12. toukokuuta 2016 17.34.42 EEST, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>> We should either fix our unicore32 support to use the real
>>>>&
> get_maintainer.pl now properly recognizes that the file in
> include/hw/unicore32/ belongs to UniCore32.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Looks ok to me.
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9d17cb3
> On 20 May 2016 at 13:48, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> On torstaina 12. toukokuuta 2016 17.34.42 EEST, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> We should either fix our unicore32 support to use the real
>>> syscall numbers, or just drop it; since nobody has touched
>>> linux-user/unicore32 since 2012, and there have be
> N.B. If you are on CC, see after the '---' for a requested action!
>
> The license of SoftFloat-2b is claimed to be GPLv2 incompatible by
> the FSF due to an indemnification clause. The previous release,
> SoftFloat-2a, did not contain this clause. The only changes between
> these two versions
12 matches
Mail list logo
