Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 08:55:34AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > My suggestion is to use a counter *in the UAPI*, not in the hypervisor > protocol. (And as long as that counter can only miss increments in a > cryptographically negligible fraction of cases, everything's fine.) OK I got it now and I agr

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 07:52:48AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:37 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 07:01:31AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > > > Microsoft's documentation > > > (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260709) s

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 07:01:31AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > Microsoft's documentation > (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260709) says that the VM > Generation ID that we get after a fork "is a 128-bit, > cryptographically random integer value". If multiple people use the > same image, it gu

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:40:08AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > [adding some more people who are interested in RNG stuff: Andy, Jason, > Theodore, Willy Tarreau, Eric Biggers. also linux-api@, because this > concerns some pretty fundamental API stuff related to RNG usage] > > On Fri,