On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:12:00AM -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:21:12AM -0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>> >> On 12/04/2013 0
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:21:12AM -0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>> On 12/04/2013 07:39 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> >On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:00:24AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> >>>Developers will only be happy with seccomp if it's easy an
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/06/2012 23:53, Corey Bryant ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Can each thread have separate seccomp whitelists? For example CPU
>>> threads should not need pretty much anything but the I/O thread needs
>>> I/O.
>>>
>>
>> No, seccomp filters are define
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 11:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 13:43 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/07/2011 01:32 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>>>
>>>
> That woul
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 11:52 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Anthony,
>>
>> Thank you for your comments!
>>
>> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:37 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2011 02:40 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
I
