Mattia Gentilini (QD) wrote:
Tim Walker wrote:
That may not be true - I'm not sure but I think something reasonable
could be done in Java. There is certainly a Java VNC client available
which could play a part.
The FLOZ project
http://www.oszoo.org/wiki/index.php/Free_Live_OS_Zoo
Christian Bourque wrote:
Face it, putting a GUI on something like QEMU is going to require at
least a one per desktop/platform effort. And that can best be kept with
the GNOME/KDE/etc software repositories because they require constant
updating on the schedule of the rest of the desktop environm
John Morris wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
I appreciate the effort that some are making to develop a GUI for QEMU -
There's a few project I see that trying to achieve this. But, I wish
they all could come together and work together to develop a nice GUI. I
w
Thanks for the replies.
I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
tradeoff would be speed for x86 users vs ease of image maintenan
Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
feedback would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Tim
Tim Walker wrote:
How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build
environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image
How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build
environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Paul Brook wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 19:14, Thomas Steffen wrote:
On 5/19/05, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think GNU lightning really gains us much. We'd still have to do
the hard bits (optimization, register allocation, assigning stack slots,
