On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Steven Noonan writes:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Markus Armbruster
>> wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
>>>> On 10 November 2015 at 17:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>&g
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 10 November 2015 at 17:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2015 16:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
clang 3.7.0 on x86_64 warns about the following:
disas/arm.c:1782:17: warning: shift
option to disable the stack protector
entirely, and conditional stack protector flag selection (in order, based on
availability): -fstack-protector-strong, -fstack-protector, no stack protector.
Signed-off-by: Steven Noonan
Cc: Anthony Liguori
Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil
---
configure | 18
option to disable the stack protector
entirely, and conditional stack protector flag selection (in order, based on
availability): -fstack-protector-strong, -fstack-protector, no stack protector.
Signed-off-by: Steven Noonan
---
configure | 18 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions
From: Steven Noonan
The -fstack-protector flag family is useful for ensuring safety and for
debugging, but has a performance impact. Here's a boot time comparison between
a QEMU build of qemu-system-arm with and without the -fstack-protector-all
flag:
# WITHOUT -fstack-protecto
From: Steven Noonan
This is caused by a linux/xattr.h and sys/xattr.h incompatibility:
In file included from
/home/snoonan/Development/qemu/include/qemu/xattr.h:27:0,
from fsdev/virtfs-proxy-helper.c:25:
/usr/include/sys/xattr.h:31:3: error: expected identifier
From: Steven Noonan
Signed-off-by: Steven Noonan
Cc: Anthony Liguori
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index bdff4e4..807054b 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ common de-ch es fo fr-ca hu ja
