Christian MICHON wrote:
First rule of (efficient) engineering: <>
for the record: gcc-3.3-x is *fine* and *most* stable,
not just on windows. It's still my reference compiler
even for linux kernels.
Why do you feel it's necessary to upgrade? Because
gcc people do?
Don't get me wrong, Ch
Paul Brook wrote:
"sledgehammer" and "nut" spring to mind :-)
The attached patch is sufficient to get qemu working on win32 when compiled
with gcc3.4. I've successfully booted a knoppix CD inside qemu on a windows
host with this patch.
The problem was that gcc is choosing inconvenient names
Paul Brook wrote:
Are you sure you included the correct patch?
I don't see anything win32 specific about this patch. AFAICS it's just the
gcc4 patch *that I wrote* and posed some time ago.
Both cygwin and mingw is still using gcc3.4.x, so it shouldn't be necessary.
Paul -
Please don'
Hello all -
I wrote to the list a few days ago to gauge interest in adding
support for GCC in the Win32 environment to the QEMU codebase. I
received no response to that inquiry, but decided to update my patch for
the 0.7.1 release anyway in hopes that it will be of use to people. The
pat
Hello all -
I wrote about this a couple of days ago on the QEMU forum at
"http://qemu.dad-answers.com";, before I knew about the existence of this
mailing list.
I recently built the 0.7.0 source tarball on a Windows 2000
workstation with GCC 3.4, but had a difficult time doing so. Th
