On Thursday 03 September 2015 18:27:20 Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 September 2015 at 02:38, Stefan Brüns
wrote:
> > Instead of creating a temporary copy for the whole environment and
> > the arguments, directly copy everything to the target stack.
> >
> > For this to work, we have to change the
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 19:42:26 you wrote:
> >> > --- a/linux-user/linuxload.c
> >> > +++ b/linux-user/linuxload.c
> >> > @@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ int loader_exec(int fdexec, const char *filename,
> >> > char
> >> > **argv, char **envp,>
> >> >
> >> > int retval;
> >> > int i;
> >> >
>
On Thursday 27 August 2015 21:35:41 Stefan Brüns wrote:
PING!
> Instead of creating a temporary copy for the whole environment and
> the arguments, directly copy everything to the target stack.
>
> For this to work, we have to change the order of stack creation and
> copying the arguments.
>
>
On Sunday 23 August 2015 01:47:52 Stefan Brüns wrote:
> Instead of creating a temporary copy for the whole environment and
> the arguments, directly copy everything to the target stack.
>
> For this to work, we have to change the order of stack creation and
> copying the arguments.
>
> Signed-off
On Wednesday 19 August 2015 22:57:53 you wrote:
[...]
>
> I think we have enough repetitions of '32' here to merit a #define.
>
> But having said all that, I wonder if it would be better to
> precalculate how big a page array we need and just do the
> allocation once, rather than having this comp
