On 3/15/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is still wrong.
>
> So, is this a known bug?
Still wrong implies it's a bug, and your patch does not fix it properly.
I know that...
I was not clear.. sorry...
what I mean is: do you agree that there was a bug in these instructions?
a abort:
- Base Restored Abort Model and Base Updated Abort Model.
So, we can not understand why it will give incorect results if a load faults...
Paul
thanks
Rodrigo Vivi
vivijim at freenode
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-dev
* 300 */
.long sys_unlinkat
.long sys_renameat
.long sys_linkat
.long sys_symlinkat
.long sys_readlinkat/* 305 */
.long sys_fchmodat
.long sys_faccessat
?
Thanks,
Regards
Rodrigo Vivi.
On 2/27/07, Rodrigo Vivi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a system arm from scra
es any body has any idea about what can be happening here?
Thanks,
Rodrigo Vivi.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Hi all,
Is there someone working on armv6 support?
I'm very interested to help this development...
Thanks,
Rodrigo Vivi.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel