On 04/20/2016 05:24 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 20.04.2016 um 03:56 hat Ric Wheeler geschrieben:
On 04/19/2016 10:09 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:18:39AM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 04/19/2016 08:07 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
Bug fixes for gluster; third patch is to prevent
a
On 04/19/2016 10:09 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:18:39AM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 04/19/2016 08:07 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
Bug fixes for gluster; third patch is to prevent
a potential data loss when trying to recover from
a recoverable error (such as ENOSPC).
Hi Jeff
On 04/19/2016 08:07 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
Bug fixes for gluster; third patch is to prevent
a potential data loss when trying to recover from
a recoverable error (such as ENOSPC).
Hi Jeff,
Just a note, I have been talking to some of the disk drive people here at LSF
(the kernel summit for file
We had a thread discussing this not on the upstream list.
My summary of the thread is that I don't understand why gluster should drop
cached data after a failed fsync() for any open file. For closed files, I think
it might still happen but this is the same as any file system (and unlikely to
