On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Prateek Sharma
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Prateek Sharma
>>> wrote:
>>>>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Prateek Sharma wrote:
>> I am writing to ask whether there is any possibility of silent data
>> corruption with virtIO/qemu.
>> My files inside the guest are getting zeroed out
Hello all,
I am writing to ask whether there is any possibility of silent data
corruption with virtIO/qemu.
My files inside the guest are getting zeroed out. Specifically, bytes
512 to 4096 on some files are being zeroed out. (some 60K files out of
5Million are showing this so far). The virtua
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Prateek Sharma wrote:
>> $QEMU -cpu core2duo,+vmx -drive file=$VM_PATH,if=virtio,aio=native
>> -drive file=viotest.img,if=virtio,index=2
>
> -drive cache=none is typically used for
Hello everyone,
I am testing virtio-blk throughput (single thread, using hdparm -tT
). I want to know what is the guest/baremetal sequential read ratio
with the current qemu / qemu-kvm builds.
I have tried with qemu 1.0, 0.15, 0.14.1 , but my guest throughput is
limited to 65 MB/s. Baremetal is
