Armbruster wrote:
> Phillip, this doesn't apply anymore. I'm reviewing the QAPI schema part
> anyway.
>
> Peter, there is a question for you below. Search for "Sphinx".
>
> phillip.en...@gmail.com writes:
>
> > From: Phillip Tennen
> >
&g
ip
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:25 AM Roman Bolshakov
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:49:47PM +0100, phillip.en...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Phillip Tennen
> >
> > This patch implements a new netdev device, reachable via -netdev
> > vmnet-macos, that’s backed by
ro is... available), and will
validate the other vmnet symbols I reference as well.
Phillip
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:51 AM Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:54 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Phillip Tennen
> >
> > This patch implements a new netdev device,
Hrm, good catch. I'm not sure how I missed that.
I'm removing this patch for my next round.
Thanks!
Phillip
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:56 AM Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/02/2021 17.25, phillip.en...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Phillip Tennen
> >
> > Although we a
all three mode types. Thus,
could I make the `NetdevVmnetOptions` contain a mode field
and a mode-specific union of options, to avoid the direct union-union
nesting?
Phillip
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:51 PM Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/4/21 10:25 AM, phillip.en...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From
Thanks very much for your
time!
Phillip Tennen