On 08/09/2012 03:09 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Phil Staub wrote:
For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
mail saying "Ping" and giving a url to the patch in patchwork,
like this one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/163705/
Eventuall
On 08/09/2012 01:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 9 August 2012 21:01, Phil Staub wrote:
On 08/09/2012 12:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
mail saying "Ping" and giving a
On 08/09/2012 12:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
From: Richard Henderson
On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote
On 08/07/2012 05:10 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
From: Richard Henderson
On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
I have verified this change with system emulation
>CP0_SRSConf4_rw_bitmask;
> > env->CP0_SRSConf4 = env->cpu_model->CP0_SRSConf4;
> > +env->active_fpu.fcr0 = env->cpu_model->CP1_fcr0;
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
>
>
> r~
What are the plans for this patch? It doesn't appear to have been
applied in any of the repository branches.
Thanks,
Phil
--
Phil Staub, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Direct: 702.290.0470 Fax: 702.982.0085
