> On Wednesday 04 October 2006 11:00 am, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> I am a fan of a qemu-user mailing list
Personally, I'd also prefer a mailing list over a forum. Just to mention
it :)
Bye, Mike
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://
Hi.
The attached trivial patch for current CVS adds config-host-kqemu.mak to
the list of removed files in the distclean target.
Bye, Mike
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile (revision 4)
+++ Makefile (working copy)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:33 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of
> >the documentation isn't generated.
> Not quite, you'll get
> texi2html -monolithic etc failed
> make: Error (ignored)
>
> and the build will move on.
Uhm.
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:54 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> What about just doing this
> -install -m 644 qemu-doc.html qemu-tech.html "$(docdir)"
That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of
the documentation isn't generated.
Bye, Mike
_
Hi again.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:43 +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote:
> The attached patch ...
... contained some stuff that should have been ignored by diff. Sorry,
revised patch attached to this mail.
Bye, Mike
diff -urN qemu-cvs/Makefile qemu-cvs-o42/Makefile
--- qemu-cvs/Makefile 2006-02
Hi.
The compilation of the latest qemu CVS version aborted due to a missing
texi2html package. In my opinion, the build shouldn't depend on
texi2html and pod2man. I suggest to make the documentation optional and
warn the user if any of the necessary tools are missing.
The attached patch modifies
Hi.
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 15:32 -0800, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> FYI, Fabrice has a hard enough time tracking patches.
That sounds familiar. We (MadWifi, that is) had similar problems about
half a year ago. Due to the preferences of the previous maintainer of
this driver we did nearly everything
Hi.
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 17:38 -0800, Andre Pech wrote:
> I change a hardware simulation, I instead patched qemu to support
> dynamically loading hardware plugin files at run time.
> [...]
> I am more than willing to put all the effort into turning this into a
> nice patch, if there is a maintain
Hi.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:24 -0700, Josè Gerardo Gonzàlez Jimènez wrote:
> Hi, i'm new on this list... bus i have a suggestion, is not ease
> read mails with 100 lines of code...
It would be easier for you if you'd switch away from digest mode. That
way you would get every single mail as su
Hi all.
Disclaimer: I'm quite new to things like virtual machines, and even
half-baked when it comes to QEMU. I'm aware that my idea might be
absurd, but still it's worth a try :)
I'm wondering if it would be possible to modify QEMU such that VMs could
access PCI devices on the host system. And,
10 matches
Mail list logo