On 10/23/2015 03:08 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:03:24 +0200
> Matthias Lange wrote:
>
>> This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the HID to each processor object.
>>
>> Until commit 20843d processor objects used to have a _HID. According
>
bjects and restore the old behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Lange
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 95e0c65..314cd0b 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -1153,6 +1153,9 @@
On 10/22/2015 03:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:42:05PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
>>>> Processor nodes crea
Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
feature a _HID string. This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the _HID
string to each processor node.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Lange
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/i386/ac
On 10/22/2015 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
>> Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
>> feature a _HID string. This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the _HID
&g