Hello Prashant,
first of all your "0x4<<64" is wrong it's "0x4<<60".
In Volume 2 of the IASDM page 2:46 you see that these three upper bits
correspond to the 8 virtual regions (here: region 2).
So maybe you can just disregard these bits and use the rest as new offset
to an faked guest_base that fit
On Monday 26 March 2007 22:37, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 26/03/07, Marc Lörner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 March 2007 00:08, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > > On 26/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
op.
> >
> > How about "return j + (ticks++)" instead of the loop? If I understand
> > correctly it may slow things down to below 1Hz.
>
> (I wanted to say MHz)
I dont think so, in the loop "j" is set and the while-condition is "j==i",
so unless &qu
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 15:12, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> --- Oliver Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de:
> > http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680
> >
> > Also on Slashdot:
> > http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml
> >
>
