Zeno Davatz gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dear List
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I do:
> wget
> http://qemu-forum.ipi.fi/qemu-snapshots/qemu-snapshot-2008-02-27_05.tar.bz2
> tar -xjf qemu-snapshot-2008-02-27_05.tar.bz2
> ./configure
> sudo make
...
Hello,
maybe I'm missing something, but is
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
2007/9/24, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
I had a discussion with Johannes Schindelin over my patch, that I
thought is on the maillist, but apparently it wasn't. I
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
I was concerned by having this handling outside of a proper place (i.e.
block-vvfat.c), but if we want to leave it there, wouldn't it be better
to just handle cases which would otherwise fail, and just try t
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
While you are working on vvfat issues, could you give a look to the
attached small patch?
Okay, this is what I would do:
- not make this handling dependent on vvfat (but this means checking if
the colon is the
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
I've been having problems using vvfat virtual block device. Even linux
fdisk was able to find problems with it. The reason turned out to be
simple, MBR have bogus parameters.
Thanks for doing this; I did not find any
Like others have reported to the list I'm getting:
Could not configure '/dev/rtc' to have a 1024 Hz timer. This is not a fatal
error, but for better emulation accuracy either use a 2.6 host Linux
kernel or
type 'echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq' as root.
and then
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
is support for the 440GX processor foreseen anytime soon?
(I noticed it i labelled with "TODO"...)
Which is the most similiar PPC processor already supported?
What are the differences (in term of things needed to support it)?
Thanks in advance,
Lorenzo
Possibly it's only a starting point but I could use
the files found at
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~letouzey/emul_debianppc.en.html
to actually see I could boot some linux on qemu-system-ppc.
Skipping the part aboud vde, I could boot it both with
0.9.0 and with a snapshot dated 20070406.
From the
Hi,
the attached patch is an attempt to fix support of
virtual FAT disk images when used with -snapshot
option.
This combination doesn't work anymore in 0.9.0,
and the reason seems to be that code in block.c
that handles -snapshot, completely disregards
the different "filename" format used for vv
Hi,
I tried to use the new -kernel-qemu option with the
CVS version of qemu from yesterday and kqemu-1.3.0pre3.
Is anybody interested in error reports?
As suggested on IRC, I guess only Fabrice could be,
anyway ...
Regards,
Lorenzo
___
Qemu-devel m
as ;).
Thanks for your work!
Regards,
Lorenzo
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Right, it is a regression caused by a typo in kqemu 1.3.0pre6. I just
released kqemu-1.3.0pre7 which should correct the issue. Windows 98
should also work again with it.
Regards,
Fabrice.
Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
I see t
I see this also.
host is Fedora Core 4
guest is a 2.4 kernel
It seems to die in modify_ldt(), the libc function just after returning
from the modify_ldt() system call, if I understand the traces.
This doesn't happen using the same qemu with kqemu-1.3.0pre5.
Attached are gdb and strace output
12 matches
Mail list logo
