<20100927213203.ga28...@moo.pl>; from Leszek Urbanski on Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at
23:32:03 +0200
> > > > >It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's
> > > > >2.6.32-23
> > > > >(based on 2.6.32.21).
> > > &g
<20100926154324.gd21...@redhat.com>; from Michael S. Tsirkin on Sun, Sep 26,
2010 at 17:43:24 +0200
> > > >It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23
> > > >(based on 2.6.32.21).
> > > >
> > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload
> > >
<4c9a4c77.2080...@codemonkey.ws>; from Anthony Liguori on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at
13:35:35 -0500
> >>Is the guest kernel vanilla 2.6.32.22 or is it a distro kernel? If the
> >>later, what distro?
> >>
> >>The difference in the two invocations is that with the -device syntax,
> >>you're getting offl
<4c9a3faf.9090...@codemonkey.ws>; from Anthony Liguori on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at
12:41:03 -0500
> Is the guest kernel vanilla 2.6.32.22 or is it a distro kernel? If the
> later, what distro?
>
> The difference in the two invocations is that with the -device syntax,
> you're getting offload feat
Hi,
This is a qemu-kvm (i.e. not qemu) bug report. I've been told on IRC (#kvm)
that this bug report should go to this list anyway.
host and guest kernel: 2.6.32.22
arch: amd64
qemu-kvm: 0.12.5 and 0.13.0-rc1
How to reproduce: copy a large (few hundred MB) file to an NFS mount
(guest is the cli