Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: prioritize pmp errors in raise_mmu_exception()

Step 2 mentions the exception code should be " access-fault exception corresponding to the original access type". i.e. 1, 5, 7. All other steps should use " page-fault exception corresponding to the original access type". i.e. 12, 13, 15. Regards, Joseph Chan On Mon, Apr 15, 20

Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: prioritize pmp errors in raise_mmu_exception()

:" and "With physical address for instruction:" gives me the impression that when the implementation can distinguish between these situations, then reporting 12 , 13, 15 instead of 1, 5, 7 will provide a fine-grained reason for why things were broken. Regards, Joseph Chan On Sat, Apr