Hi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:03:24PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 04:49 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:51:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>the real problem is the
> >>"ehci warning: guest updated active QH"
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:51:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 03:01 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> >
> >There will always be a race between the call to USBDEVFS_DISCARDURB
> >and the URB completing. IMHO the handling in usb_host_stop_n_free_iso()
&g
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:27:28PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 05:26 PM, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> >Reopening this issue with usb-host stalling now
> >
> >ehci warning: guest updated active QH
> >USBDEVFS_DISCARDURB: Invalid argument
> >USBDEVFS_DISCARDURB: Invalid argument
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:51:31PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Add a timeout handler. In case bulk transfers take too long to finish
> the request will be canceled. The timeout is tunable via property, by
> default it is 5 seconds.
This patch causes an issue for my firmware download. The
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:02:22PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Largely based on a patch from Johannes Stezenbach. Splitted it up,
> > improved patch descriptions and added one related ehci bugfix.
&g
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Largely based on a patch from Johannes Stezenbach. Splitted it up,
> improved patch descriptions and added one related ehci bugfix.
>
> Johannes, does this series fix your firmware update issue?
The series look
Hi Gerd,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Zero-length packets are valid but currently cause
> qemu to crash:
did you have a chance to look at this?
Thanks,
Johannes
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0
c:1393
1393ret = usb_handle_packet(dev, &q->packet);
(gdb) p q->sgl
$4 = {sg = 0xf9160410, nsg = 0, nalloc = 5, size = 0}
Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach
---
Note that I didn't do sufficient testing. I have a proprietary
firmware update tool which does one large bulk trans
tat() the ensure the ioctls are
only used on block devices.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach
---
discussed in http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110617090424.ga19...@sig21.net
I'll also send a Linux kernel patch but this is needed to
fix the warning on old kernels.
diff --git a/block/raw-posix.c
tat() the ensure the ioctls are
only used on block devices.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach
---
discussed in http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110617090424.ga19...@sig21.net
I'll also send a Linux kernel patch but this is needed to
fix the warning on old kernels.
v2: changes according to review com
Hi,
just a few thoughts from a qemu novice...
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:00:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This series introduces a hard dependency on glib. The initial use is portable
> threads but I see this as just the beginning. Glib/Gobject offer many nice
> things including:
>
> -
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 08:00:33AM -0600, David S. Ahern wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 07:23 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 26.05.2010 15:06, schrieb David S. Ahern:
> >>
> >> My understanding is that the port routing happens internally to the host
> >> controller based on device speed - section 4.2 (pag 64
12 matches
Mail list logo
