On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:03:38AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > Yes, the resulting mail would be correct, in the sense that it could be
> > applied just fine by git-am. But I think it would be uglier. IOW, I
> > consider the presence of the in-body From to be a clue that something
> > i
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:19:18PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > if (cmit_fmt_is_mail(pp->fmt)) {
> > - if (pp->from_ident && ident_cmp(pp->from_ident, &ident)) {
> > + if (pp->always_use_in_body_from ||
> > + (pp->from_ident && ident_cmp(pp->from_id
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:05:45AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > But as you can already read from the manual, the overall behaviour of git
> > regarding a separate "From:" line in the email body was intended solely for
> > the use case sender != author. So in practice (at least in my git version)
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:34:14PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Sometimes people respond "y" (or "yes") when asked
> this question:
>
> Which 8bit encoding should I declare [UTF-8]?
>
> We already have a mechanism to avoid accepting a mistyped e-mail
> address (we ask to confirm when the g
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:17:15PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Would "length() > 1" be enough[1]? Or are people really typing "yes" and
> > not just "y"?
> >
> > I cannot imagine a charset name that is smaller than two characters. It
> > may be that there are none smaller than 4, and we could
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:29:07AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
> > On 02/05/2015 04:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:27:23PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
> >>> This series is based on the previous patchset from Chen Fan:
> >>> https://lists.nongnu