On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The other approach is a memory page "discard" mechanism - which
> obviously requires more code changes than zeroing freed pages.
>
> The advantage is that we don't take the brute-force and CPU intensive
> approach of zeroing pages. It wou
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> To throw a spanner in, the most widely supported filesystem across
>> operating systems is probably NFS, version 2 :-)
>
> Remember that Windows usage on a VM is not some rare use case
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
> That's all good and well. The question now is which direction would
> the community prefer to go. Would everyone be just happy with
> virtio-9p passthrough? Would it support multiple OSs (Windows comes to
> mind here)? Or would we eventually
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:39 PM, MORITA Kazutaka
wrote:
> Thanks for many comments.
>
> Sheepdog git trees are created.
great!
is there any client (no matter how crude) besides the patched
KVM/Qemu? it would make it far easier to hack around...
--
Javier
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Chris Webb wrote:
> If the chunks into which the virtual drives are split are quite small (say
> the 64MB used by Hadoop), LVM may be a less appropriate choice. It doesn't
> support very large numbers of very small logical volumes very well.
absolutely. the 'nice
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:41 AM, MORITA Kazutaka
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> If so, is it reasonable to compare this to a cluster file system setup (like
>> GFS) with images as files on this filesystem? The difference would be that
>> clustering is implemented
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Dor Laor wrote:
> Some figures: Linux rx 350Mbps, tx 150bps, Windows rx 700mbps, tx 100 mbps.
very nice!
in a related note, the VMWare tools package, which is supposed to 'enhance
performance' by installing 'specially tuned' drivers into a guest, doesn't
include ne
