Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support

You may also want to look at Dawson Engler's VCODE. Like GNU Lightning it's not been touched in a while. Ian Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005, Paul Brook wrote: Do you have a URL? Neither google nor freshmeat.net turn up anything useful. Sorry, here it is:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support

are for things that sit in dynamic code for a long period of time, which isn't too surprising. We are working on equivalent results to QEMU fast, but our approach is different to that of QEMU and I completely agree that trying to get QEMU/PearColator to co-exist wouldn't be th

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am definetly out of my depth here, but... Speaking of GCJ's JIT... Sometime back, Ian Rogers here brought up the PearColator project at: http://www.binarytranslator.org/ We're still here and hacking. PearColator and QEMU are quite different projects and

Re: [Qemu-devel] QVM86, SKAS.. many modules, one vision?

means you can't map pages at the end of the address space. That's why some module support would be good. Regards, Ian Rogers ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

[Qemu-devel] QVM86, SKAS.. many modules, one vision?

nux module specifically for emulation? Regards, Ian Rogers - http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/apt/projects/jamaica - http://www.binarytranslator.org/ ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

Re: [Qemu-devel] Profiling Qemu for speed?

;s compiler. Regards, Ian Rogers -- http://www.binarytranslator.org/ ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

Re: [Qemu-devel] Profiling Qemu for speed?

the translator's profiled performance improved using FDO. I have results from writing things in Java, where FDO is par for the course, but they hardly apply to QEMU/GCC. Regards, Ian Rogers -- http://www.binarytranslator.org/ Daniel Egger wrote: On 18.04.2005, at 11:51, Ian Rogers wrote: I'm not

Re: [Qemu-devel] Profiling Qemu for speed?

ibly this would save 10% in the translator. Sorry if this is obvious. Regards, Ian Rogers -- http://www.binarytranslator.org/ Daniel J Guinan wrote: This conversation, below, is very interesting. It is precisely this part of QEMU that fascinates me and potentially holds the most promise for perfor