As per commit 5626f8c6d468 ("rcu: Add automatically released rcu_read_lock
variants"), RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() should be used instead of
rcu_read_{un}lock().
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
target/arm/kvm.c | 17 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
di
On Thu, May 27 2021 at 11:45:26 AM +0100, Peter Maydell
wrote:
What issue are we trying to fix by making this change ?
I suppose that it wouldn't fix any issues in the current state of
affairs,
maybe it is something to reconsider if glibc ever changes such that,
sigprocmask is no longer MT
On Thu, May 27 2021 at 11:16:56 AM +0100, Peter Maydell
wrote:
If we do want to change from sigprocmask() to pthread_sigmask(), we
should be consistent about doing that, not just change this call
only.)
On that note, do you think it would worthwhile to have a Coccinelle
script replace all
Use pthread_sigmask instead of sigprocmask inside process_pending_signals
to ensure that race conditions aren't possible.
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
linux-user/signal.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
