Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] [NEW] SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
s again for your interest, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] [NEW] SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
error does not appear when compiling from current master. I am compiling with $ git clean -fdx $ ./configure --target-list=s390x-linux-user $ make -j16 Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] [NEW] SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
sion 2.12.50 (v2.12.0-1976-g76ed4b18de-dirty) Copyright (c) 2003-2017 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers $ /qemu-s390x-new ./a.out Istruzione non consentita > stckf will end up at the same helper, so it seems likely to hit the > same problem. I guessed so. Thanks again, Giovanni.

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] [NEW] SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Public bug reported: qemu-s390x in user mode crashes with SIGILL (under host architecture x86_64, running Debian unstable) when executing target instruction "stck" ("STORE CLOCK", see https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg26480faec85f44e2385256d5200627dee&aid=1), which is basically a k

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] Re: SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
** Attachment added: "rdtsc.S" https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1815024/+attachment/5236688/+files/rdtsc.S -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815024 Title: SIGILL on instruction

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] Re: SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
** Attachment added: "log.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1815024/+attachment/5236689/+files/log.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815024 Title: SIGILL on instruction

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] Re: SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode

2019-02-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
I am also attaching the compiled program, in case it is helpful. ** Attachment added: "test" https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1815024/+attachment/5236690/+files/test -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1310324] Re: Commit 0f842f8a introduces regression when using tcg-interpreter

2014-04-27 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
I can confirm that your change fixes my problem as well. Thank you very much! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310324 Title: Commit 0f842f8a introduces regression when using tcg-inter

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1310324] Re: Commit 0f842f8a introduces regression when using tcg-interpreter

2014-04-20 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
I forgot: winxp_test.img is just an empty 15 GB (sparse) file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310324 Title: Commit 0f842f8a introduces regression when using tcg-interpreter Status

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1310324] [NEW] Commit 0f842f8a introduces regression when using tcg-interpreter

2014-04-20 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Public bug reported: Hi. Commit 0f842f8a246f2b5b51a11c13f933bf7a90ae8e96 apparently introduces a regression when using --enable-tcg-interpreter. The regression is manifested as follows: 1. Checkout any qemu commit later or equal that the one said above. Beside that one, I tested v1.7.1, v2.0.0