implest option; I sent some patch
>series recently with two different implementations for x86.
>
>
Both of control signals and (shadow) memory storage are required. So, the
virtual device may be the right choice.
In this year’s top security conferences (Oakland, CCS, Usenix Security, NDSS
and so on), many works are based on virtual technology. So I think QEMU is a
good choice for future academic research.
Thank you very much for your time and help!
Best regards!
F. Zhang
e hard to
implement the real-time communication between guest OS and QEMU. A pseudo
device may be a better choice.
>PS: eduardo cruz might be an interesting person to talk to..he did
>instrumention work lately too
Thanks! but what about his mail? Is he in the mailing list?
Thank you very much! I think I get so many from the discussion!
>
>--
Best regards!
F. Zhang
s.
The question is: how to communicate between the QEMU and the guest OS, so that
they can cooperate with each other?
Maybe I should read code of TEMU. Er…, That’s a huge work for me.
Best regards
F. Zhang
WELCOMED!
Thank you very much in advance!
Best regards
F. Zhang